Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:48:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Pacedebate@total.confusion.net
To: Multiple recipients of list CX-L <cx-l@debate.net>
Subject: mba case list
[ Part 1, Text/PLAIN (charset: Unknown "UTF-8") 129 lines. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]
[ The following text is in the "UTF-8" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
The case list I put together at MBA is below.
Tim Mahoney
Debate coach, St. Mark's School of Texas
Centerville Buckles and Liao
plan we feel that the dehumanization of intersectional people is
unacceptable. Thus theplan: In order to significantly increase the
protection
of privacy in the areaof employment, Maggie and I demand that the United
States Congress add thephrase â^À^Üor any combination there ofâ^À^Ý to
the list of
factors protected undertitle VII. Funding and enforcement through most
optimal, then existing means.We apolgize for any rhetoric deemed
offensive
and are open to suggestion.
GlenbrookNorth Greenstein and Nathan
plancongress should prohibit the United States Armed Forces from basing
hiring,firing, investigation, penalty, or promotion decisions on sexual
preference.Weâ^À^Ùll clarify.
GrapevineDineen and Veeravagu
Thereforeunderstanding the complexity of discrimination and the multiple
dimensions ittargets â^À^Ó also noting that shane realizes his privilege
as a
white person whois left untouched because of the profile-also realizing
that
the profiles arebased on a flawed concept of the â^À^Ümiddle eastâ^À^Ý
when
targeting suspects; wedemand:
To protecttraveler information the United States Federal Government will
ban
all forms ofaviational â^À^Üterroristâ^À^Ý profile systems throughout the
united
states. Weâ^À^Ùllclarify. Enforcement guaranteed with an affirmative
ballot.
Recourse will beprovided through FAA compliance standards.
Â
MarquetteBhatnagar and Nolan
plan usfg shallwithdraw from the Chemical Weapons Convention, overturning
any
necessarylegislation and practices. Weâ^À^Ùll clarify intent.
St. PiusBriese and Johnson
Thru allnecessary constitutional means, the congress shall implement a
comprehensivefederal policy, which mandates the following:
1.Application of the â^À^Üreasonable expectation of privacyâ^À^Ý standard
to the
privatesector workplace, and to all government agencies.
2. Employerand government will be required to adopt a â^À^Ücompelling
business
interestâ^À^Ý forsurveillance.
3.Employers will be required to use the least intrusive monitoring
available,with an emphasis on non-content based surveillance.
4.Injunctive relief and statuatory damages will be awarded to victims of
businessand government violations. Those carrying on the violation, or
ordering othersto do so, will be susceptible for fines up to $50,000 and
any
additionaldamages.
ErwinChemerinsky, Northwestern University Law Review, Fall 1985
Robert S.Peck Hofstra Law Review Summer 1984
LewisMaltby The Privacy for Consumers and Workers Act Y4. L11/4:5
Hrng103-150
June 22 1993
S.Elizabeth Wilborn Georgia Law Review Spring 1998
CharlesReich Yale law Journal March 1991
Matson andMatson The Dehuminization of Man 1983
Rule ThePolitics of Privacy 1980 p. 180
Hartmannand Bucci, Business and Society Review 1998 p. l/n
UniversitySchool Bryan and Lundin
The FAAwill establish a confidentiality requirement for HIV medical
records
as well asreplace current standards with the most appropriate performance
based tests.
BrianMcCormack, Journal of Law and Commerce, 1995
Erika L.Greenfield Hofstra Labor Law Journal 1997
VestaviaHills Phillips and Watson
Hays and Ioffer the following plan: The US Supreme Court will immediately
rule forFerguson in Ferguson v City of Charleston on the basis that the
city
ofCharlestonâ^À^Ùs drug testing policy violates the 4th Amendment
ofpregnant
women.
LA Times10-5-00 â^À^Üpregnant women against the governmentâ^À^Ý
WashingtonPost 10-5-00 â^À^ÜThe Supreme Court held a spiritedâ^À^Ý
KimaniPaul-Emile Michigan Journal of Race and Law Spring 1999
DorothyRoberts Harvard Law Review May 1991
BostonCollege Third World Law Journal spring 1999
KimberleCrenshaw Univer of Southern California Law review March 1992
WestminsterChaudoin and Perlberg
Congressshould significantly increase protection of privacyâ^À¦..by
passing
legislationrequiring criminal prosecution of federal agents that engage
in
surveillance(including infiltration) in the United States. Abolishing the
Freedom ofInformation Act exemptions regarding intelligence gathering
methods
andinformants, and by creating an independent oversight body to
guaranteecompliance. Congress should fully fund the relevant portions of
the
FOIA andcreate sanctions for non-compliance. We reserve the right to
clarify
intent.
|
