NFL Nationals Case List
(AK) Alaska
(AZ) Arizona
(CA) Big Orange
(CA) East Los Angeles
(CA) San Fran Bay
(CO) Colorado
(CO) Rocky Mountain-North
(CO) Rocky Mountain-South
(CO) Southern Colorado
(FL) South Florida
(GA) Georgia Northern Mountain
(GA) Georgia Southern Peach
(IA) East Iowa
(IA) West Iowa
(ID) Idaho
(IL) Northern Illinois
(IN) Hoosier Central
(IN) Hoosier South
(IN) North East Indiana
(IN) Northwest Indiana
(KS) East Kansas
(KS) Kansas Flint Hills
(KS) South Kansas
(KS) West Kansas
(KY) Kentucky
(LA) Louisiana
(MN) Central Minnesota
(MN) Northern Lights
(MN) Southern Minnesota
(MO) Carver-Truman
(MO) Eastern Missouri
(MO) Ozark
(MO) Unknown.
(MT) Montana
(NC) Carolina West
(NC) Tarheel East
(NE) Nebraska
(NE) Nebraska South
(NM) New Mexico
(NV) Golden Desert
(NV) Sagebrush
(NY) New York City
(NY) New York State
(OH) Eastern Ohio
(OH) North Coast
(OK) Oklahoma East
(OK) Oklahoma West
(OR) North Oregon
(OR) South Oregon
(PA) Pennsylvania
(PA) Pittsburgh
(PA) Valley Forge
(SD) Northern South Dakota
(SD) Rushmore
(TX) Central Texas
(TX) Lone Star
(TX) North Texas Longhorns
(TX) South Texas
(TX) West Texas
(UT) Great Salt Lake
(UT) Sundance
(UT) Utah-Wasatch
(VA) Name unknown
(VA) Patrick Henry
(WA) Eastern Washington
(WA) Puget Sound
(WA) Western Washington
(WI) Northern Wisconsin
(WI) Southern Wisconsin
(WY) Hole in the Wall
(WY) Wind River
The list was most recently updated: Sat Jun 14 17:59:45 EDT 1997
Bourland-Kimbro
They debate like TOC types. Lots of answers on
everything. Case possibilities include genetics,
abolition, drugs, runaways, or something new. They will
be up on Clinton.
J-S
- Niska-Turner
- PTD.
They have run several cases throughout the year. Most
notably a really good pre-trial detention affirmative.
Advantages are that recidivism would be lowered if
pre-trial detention were banned.
- Kessinich-Reddy
- Drug Legalization.
- Kastanek-Mayer
- Natives.
Advantages vary-- genocide, cultural preservation are
the most common.
- Jorgenson-Penfield
- Feminism.
Studies (Women's Issues): Plan studies the JJS to create
a feminist model, and they use the Maryland model as the
pilot for this, to determine sexism (and theoretically
change those laws) inherent in the system.
Advantages include (they change order): A* Patriarchy is
oppression of Women/dehumanization. A* Gangs are being
perpetuated by women gang members who are abused. A*
Labeling creates delinquency and genocide A*
Victimization of women occurs in the system.
- Kitson-Paschall
- Media Violence, Waivers.
They have run Waivers in the past, Media Violence most
recently. They have indicated to me that for the rounds
at nationals, they may (probably will) break out a new
case. I have no idea about what that case will be. On
the neg, they have the usual disads and kritik stuff. I
have heard that they have been given some NDT evidence
from Dustin Kitson's old partner Brian Ray who now
debates at the University of Kentucky. I think they got
a lot of neg, and lots of generics. (My guess is that if
it's Kentucky ev, it'll be the court order cp. PGK)
- Ramjiani-Wilsey
- Boot Camps/Aftercare.
They have been mostly running a case with Bootcamps AND
Aftercare. The combination of the two is important
because a big solvency (and other case argument) answer
is that all of the neg authors assume BC and AC as
independent of each other. In other words, the plan
still works (and all turns, etc. go away) because their
evidence says that the combo works. I have heard, also,
that they too will more than likely be running a new
case. This case is starting to get «too big» for them;
and, they might be doing some «small» case work before
the big tournament begins. On neg, they have similar evidence to
the stuff from above. It is not the same because most of
the evidence comes from Handbooks (i.e. Harvex) and the
Kansas camp. Unlike the Kitson mentioned above (who did
go to Kentucky), the evidence is not so good (i.e.
Kitson's evidence is pretty good). Plus, this team
hasn't done as much updating. They do have some of the
staple disads and other stuff, so they aren't bad.
- Gordon-Lao
- PNC.
They ran prenatal care all year long. Most probably will
run it at nats. The Brenan article, which is their link
to birth defects = crime is based on a study of 80
retarded people and if they committed violent crime. Of
course, the article later states that birth defects are
probably not related to crime, only in retards. I would
advise running extra T on effecting the mother, run
establish T, prenatal care already exists all they do is
start home visitations, scapegoating the mother and the
poor.
- Noula-Shah
- Child Abuse, PNC.
- Sekosky-Sekosky
- Deterrence.
The plan has the FCC make public service announcements
over radio and television about the increasingly harsh
sentencing on state and local levels. They claim that
this information will deter crimes, and actually make
reference to the threat of prison rape as a deterrent.
(Something about ``Bubba.'')
- Klingerman-Mulvihill
- Headstart.
- Leeds-Warner
- Rehabilitation.
Uses the MA model.
- Park-Richardson
- Natives.
- Prestwood-Stukas
- Child Abuse, Dual Currency.
Plan stops the family preservation policy as
recommended by Gellis 96. The dual currency case
claims to solve the drug problem by altering our
currency. The author is Vincent Bugliosi.
- Thummala-Trimmer
- Drug Legalization.
- Cox-Fields
- Gun Tracing, JDP.
That's us. We ran gun tracing during the year, but I
don't think we're going to run it at nats. We might run
Juvenile Death Penalty. We're just being lazy right now, so I
haven't really thought about it.
- Gondulla-Miller
- Ban Expungement.
Plan sets up a database.
Morgan-Parsons
PTD, Rohypnol.
They make it a schedule one drug. They also ran a
preventative detention case, where they overturn a
supreme court case and get rid of preventative detention
for juveniles.
- Lamar-Sherbert
- Gun Tracing, Teen Courts.
- Frost-Molle
- Drug Legalization.
They legalize them all. The advantages are Kantian
deontological imperative, and Lipschutz style enemy
creation.
- Bielke-Keener
- Parenting.
They claim a genocide advantage in Zaire off of US
leadership.
- Doss-Saxena
- Head Start.
With laboratory specifications.
- Callais-Malone
- Don't know yet.
Malone has been running Overturn DeShaney, Callais has
been running DEA Shift, so you guess.
- Eckerdt-Fevurly
- Recreation Centers.
This case is retarded, don't ask me how they got to
nationals. Advantages are Crime and Economy. Feel free
to use evidence, they seem to have a natural aversion to
it, and thus read little evidence after the 1AC.
- Millsaps-Vale
- Alcoholism.
They add a 5% tax and counteradvertise showing the public
that alcohol is bad too.
- Mosser-Wynn
- Alcoholism, Ibogane, Restorative Justice.
They run Ibogane drug treatment which bans Methodone and
replaces it with Ibogane because it is quicker and more
effective without causing addiction (so they say). They
administer treatment in community centers. They have also
run Restorative justice. On the Negative they will run
Statism.
- Albert-Madurski
- Runaways, PTD.
They claim AIDS, crime, and an emancipation/rights
advantage. At districts on Friday they also ran
pretrial detention with a Kant advantage.
- Cerulo-Sanmartino
- Gun Tracing.
The only advantage that we claim is death with some sort
of an inner-city arms race (two card) subpoint that we
very rarely go for.
Plan: The Federal Government shall establish a national
gun tracing initiative modeled after the Boston 17
Cities program and the Kansas City «Stop and Frisk"
program (Under the guidelines of Terry v. Ohio). All
programs run in conjunction with these pilot programs
shall be likewise implemented. Funding through the
current 1997 budget surplus.
- Curran-Reynolds
- Ban Ritalin, Natives.
- Eastwood-Scoville
- Gun Tracing, Racist Criminology.
- DeVine-Robinson
- Ban Corporal Punishment.
The case is the version that was put out at CDE.
On the neg, they run a lot of T and J. They went to camp
at CDE, so if you know anything about William Bennett's
style, you will know that they are similar to the Taos
team that qualified from NM.
- Bryan-Colin
- Hawaii Healthy Start.
- Johnson-Tarnoski
- Graduated Sanctions, Teen Court, Work Programs.
- Berman-Nelson
- Tobacco Tax.
We run tobacco tax and have the entire year... we'd like
to stick with it but may have to reconsider based on the
shit going down with big tobacco in SQ.
- Lundsford-Phillips
- Drug Treatment, Graduated Sanctions.
The Cheyenne East team runs a drug treatment case (it's
undefeated as yet but really nothing special... it's only
gone 8 rounds) claiming advantages on guns and AIDS.
- Agrawal-Connelly
- Boot Camps, Mentoring.
- Coons-Nowakowski
- PTD.
(They ban it but don't overturn Schall v Martin). They
also run Ban Corporal Punishment in the schools.
- Kowalewski-Sachs
- VAWA.
- Bruso-Mills
- Ban Curfews.
Ran ban curfews and loitering laws all year. Probably
stick to it considering they don't know any other case as
well.
- Ross-Seim
- Boot Camps.
Gun Tracing.
Boston Plan but they have an interesting way of
running it. I haven't hit it, but they used to run it
with some odd rez focus stuff I think... At districts
they just ran it as Boston Plan though.
- Broadwater-Sohrn
- PNC.
- Chasey-Gough
- Anonymity, Mentoring, Teen Courts.
Anonymity keeps all info on juveniles confidential. They
claim privacy rights. They claim that the trend in SQ is
toward fuller diversion of info, especially on juvis who
have been diverted to adult courts. Mentoring claims
racism.
- Heman-Schnoor
- Natives.
Transfer jurisdiction to tribal courts and ban plenary
power.
- Lawson-Wilson
- Perry Preschool?
Hello! I'm returning your letter. Molly and Doug beat
us (Todd and Drew from Frutia Monument) with their
affirmative case which establishes a mandatory pre-school
program across the nation. They are great debaters.
Also, background on Doug and Molly--NFL Qualifiers was
their 5th tournament... they are novices.
Bayer-Sanchez
- Mozer-Swanson
- Drug Treatment.
Models the Phoenix House drug treatment program on a
national level. It includes residential treatment and
mandatory treatment if you test positive to drugs when
arrested. The empirical evidence for Phoenix is not bad.
Something like 89% don't relapse into drugs or something.
They have run the Phoenix House most of the year. But at
the end they changed focus to TAP. A plan which focuses
drug rehab in the prison and detention facilities.
Advantages are the same as with Phoenix.
- Cochran-Langley
- Prison Rape.
They run moral imperative on dehumanization. doesn't
mention the word juvenile in any of their evidence. On
the neg, they also LOVE statism/anarchy combo...
- Lee-Powell
- Urban Marshall Plan.
It came from Michigan Classic's Arquette/Warner lab. It
claims crime and environmental racism. Implements 10-year
urban Marshall plan of $50 billion for inner cities. On
neg. LOVE statism (run it mainly with Kateb cards and
state nuclearism... pretty good kritik) and anarchy (run
it leftist anarchy with empirical examples of native
americans and greek city-states and global modeling and
societal peace advantages... use leftist to avoid generic
anarchy answers) combo...
- Gronberg-Lee
- PNC.
- Harper-High
- Ban Corporal Punishment.
- Dillingham-McVay
- Drug Legalization, Hackers.
- Haratani-Kruze
- Parenting, PTD.
The PTD case claims a Kantian imperative.
- Anthony-Campbell
- Poverty.
``Two little teams, both from Esperanza, that run natives
and drug-shift''. (respectively, I assume...?)
- Schaefer-Stephens
- Boot Camps, Juvenile Intimate Violence.
- Howell-Little
- Head Start.
- Hildebrandt-Soderborg
- RICO.
Have been running RICO on affirmative, and probably still
will at nationals, because one of them just posted on the list
asking for negative strategies against the case.
- Hurder-Nusinow
- Education.
Implements the Perry Pre-school project.
- Meltzer-Silverman
- Legalization:
See Bronx.
Hackers: See Glenbrook South.
Reverse Hate Crimes: Overturn the Hate Crime Sentencing
Enhancement on the grounds of violation of first
amendment rights.
- Goldstein-Helfand
- Genetics and Hackers.
The genetics case bans the search for the crime gene,
claiming genocide and crime. The hackers case places
encryption and biometrics on data systems.
I'm pretty sure that Glenbrook South's top team is
dropping out (GBS GH, Goldstein/Helfand) and Glenbrook
South's second team is the replacement. (GBS DS,
Degraff/Saks)
- Salina-Wierman
- Ban JDP.
They ban the JDP by having the Supreme Court, upon
hearing an appropriate test case, overrule the Stanford
decision. In the 1AC they claim juvenile crime (kids
love risking death; only lifetime imprisonment deters)
and 8th amendment (the precedent set by the Stanford
decision is that if a locality decides a punishment is
just, it's ok.). They run a nonviolence kritik (Gandhi)
in every 2AC and collapse to it. On the negative they
run Statism and DC.
(Two teams)
- Hussain-Talmadge
- New case.
Timmons says it'll be a new case. Hussain has been
running Natives, so if they haven't broken the new one yet,
that'd be my guess.
- Bradt-Yousuf
- RICO.
- Foster-(Kaplan-Sears)
- Job Training, Prison Rape.
- (Kay-Oliphant)-William
- Hate Crimes.
Plan stops penalty enhancements and does Aaronson model
of education, like a thing where kids sit around and
talk about racial differences and stuff.
- Pinkney-Weigel
- Hate Crimes.
Data collection & education.
- Cook & Sherman
- Drug Rehab, PTD, Minority Criminologists.
- Bevan-Rosenblatt
- Drug Legalization.
Last I heard, they were running drug legalization. On
the neg, they ALWAYS run Normativity. This team might
not attend Nationals, though. Bevan is going to be a
Fellow, and he's so full of himself he thinks he's too
cool for NFL.
- Foster-Thiessen
- Hawaii Healthy Start, Reform Boot Camps.
- Lee-Mclain
- Hawaii Healthy Start, Pot Legalization, Reform Boot Camps.
- Nunns-Walker
- Pot Legalization, Reform Boot Camps.
The entire pot case is from NORML, from their web page.
Boot Camps claim a net widening advantage. They use the New
York model, which integrates rehab with the rigor of boot
camps. They spike all the boot camps turns by claiming
to solve for them. You can still run your regular boot
camps turns, though, because the spike doesn't quite
work; they still rely on BOOT CAMPS, whatever they claim
about rehab.
- Avondet-Wilkinson
- IAP.
This does some restructuring of the post-imprisonment
stuff.
- Baugher-Hall
- Natives.
- Bailey-Lee
- Abolish, Community Policing.
- Modi-Patel
- Data.
Have the CDC evaluate school violence prevention programs
Advantages are violence, federalism, and infectious diseases.
Nash-Plummer
- (Evan-Shosan)-Heinz
- Education, Hate Speech.
Plan uses Perry Preschool as a replacement to Head Start,
then Perry plus Quantum Opportunities Program for High School
kids, then Summer Youth Employment Programs. Watch this case
closely. They use a 1995 card that says Clinton/government
slashed funds by a lot, but last year (Or maybe this year)
Clinton reestablished those funds and added more money.
The hate speech case claims a threat construction
advantage and a constitutive criminology advantage. (One
card each.) It also claims justice based on the equal
protection clause. The plan: Congress will adopt the
following program and it will be affirmed by the US
Supreme Court as constitutional. 1. Protections for hate
speech will be narrowly tailored as per Matsuda. 2. The
speech will be considered _sui generis_ and universally
condemned. 3. Lawsuits for hate speech will be in civil,
not criminal trials. Normal means, any questions just
ask.
- Peff-Willemin
- Abolish, Hate Speech, TV violence.
Have run Abolition of the JJS most of the year, but they were
also running TV Violence at the two National Qualifier
tournaments. The hate speech case (Harvard) bans all hate
speech and claims Delgado and threat construction, via Lipschutz.
T story is that adult hate speech spurs juvenile hate crime.
- Blevins-Morgan
- Crack, Hackers.
I think this team ran the same case as Merchant-Morley
(see below), but at times I heard they also ran Hackers.
- Merchant-Morley
- Crack.
They ran a case which lessens the penalties regarding
crack cocaine offenses to make them the same as powder
cocaine. The main advantage is racism, claiming that
blacks predominantly use crack cocaine so tougher
penalties on it are discriminatory. The juvenile crime
tie-in is some sort of labeling scenario.
- Hodgson-Munk
- Abolish.
At the State tournament, they ran Abolish the JJS with
Ageism as the advantage. Big-time kritik debaters, on
the aff and the neg. They run Normativity on the neg.
- Barnes-Goodwin
- Education.
Rather redundant hegemony advantage, with an economy
link, and economy advantage, with a hegemony impact.
Also a crime advantage, in there for T reasons.
- Davis-Moore
- Prevention.
New standards for federal prevention programs have to
achieve to be given federal funding. Claims that the new
standards are the established program. All programs
(Headstart etc.) that don't work now will. Vague and very
non-topical.
- Bell-Morrow
- Hawaii Healthy Start, Summer Youth Employment Program, Gun Tracing.
On HHS, we claim abuse and crime advantages, with an
optional advantage stemming from upholding the UN
standards for rights of children via the International
Children's movement. SYEP claims crime and
competitiveness, with advantages off the deflation
conflict cards from Khalizhad , Bailey, and Mead. Gun
Tracing is standard 17 cities, with possible advantages
including juvenile arms race as well as eliminating
militia movements.
- Cooley-Roberds
- School Hours, Vouchers, Weather.
School Hours claims crime is between 3 and 6, so they
change hours to 9:30-5:30. Advantages are Crime, Safety,
and Education. Weather is REALLY STRANGE. They export
Clean Coal to China, reducing global warming, and have
numerous cards claiming that high temperatures are
directly responsible for juvenile crime. Advantages are
Global Warming, Crime, and Spratlies. Vouchers are based
off the East Harlem experiment, with advantages of Crime
and International Democracy.
Addendum
Kickapoo MO lied to you. Bell-Morrow is running Hawaii
Healthy Start, Job Corps/Summer Youth Employment, and Am.
Correctional Assn. guidelines for overcrowding of
juvenile facilities. Cooley-Roberds is running schools
hours and peer mediation/conflict resolution. The whole
weather/clean coal case is a sham. If Kickapoo sent you
the Missouri case list, then don't trust what they said
about themselves.
- Kovalchik-Rogel
- Abolish, DeShaney, Natives, Single Sex Schools.
DeShaney case is straight-forward child abuse. The plan:
1. Congress will act in its Morgan Right and overturn the
ruling in the 1989 DeShaney v. Winnebago decision by
establishing an affirmative duty for all government
agencies to provide adequate child protection. The
Supreme Court will concur in this decision. 2. The
federal government shall establish a comprehensive child
abuse prevention program. It will expand prevention,
training, and screening programs at the federal, state,
and local levels. 3. We will fund and enforce the plan
through normal means.
- Breczinski-Kelly
- Drug Legalization, Genetics.
Genetics is the same as GBS. Advantages are labeling,
genocide.
- Maloney-Monten
- Bullets, Gun Tracing.
- Marks-Wilson
- Population.
The plan uses family planning to reach a target of 1.5
children per family. They claim Malthusian resource
wars. The T cards are very good.
- Jerome-Rob
- Zero Tolerence.
The establish a mandatory nationwide alcohol
zero-tolerence program. Solvency evidence is from all
the states that have it. I think they have four
advantages - three of them are saving lives, the other
one reduces the amount of DUI's.
- Hochstetler-Seymour
- Drug legalization.
On the neg, they always run some variant of CLS.
McCoy-Renken
- Bair-Donagan
- Drug Legalization.
The standard cards that everyone has seen, like the
Ostrowski card about the day after. Has crime, military
crackdown, personal liberty, and I think interdiction as
advantages.
- Hesselius-Moreno
- Increase Waivers.
They ran Waivers for juveniles ages 15 and up, and
adding on to prisons (building separate facilities for
the newly incarcerated juveniles). Advantages were
Juvenile Crime, Justice for juveniles, and Eliminating
Overcrowding in juvenile detention centers. However, at
the tourney they also ran Eubonics. I couldn't tell you
much about this case since we didn't hit it. Hope this
helps.
- Chai-Hughes
- Job Training.
Advantages include dropouts, gangs, and morality.
- Liebrich-Litton
- Hackers, PTD.
The PTD case only claims rape and crime.
At NCFLs, they were running an internet case, reliant on
«rating the internet» and some program (software) called
PITT.. don't know much else about it, the judge from my
school who judged that round didn't save his flows..
Big inherency prob, plus the fact that they can't fiat
anything outside of the US.. also, i hear, they claim
that kids get terrorist info from the internet, but
most/all of their cards talk about porno.
- Fisher-Weinshall
- Ban Vaccines, Gun Tracing.
It claims anthropocentricism and a crime advantage. Main
neg strategy is federalism and states.
- Aerts-Lohmeier
- Gun Tracing, VAWA.
- Christenson-Krickbaum
- Gun Tracing, Parenting.
- Earley-Ghavi
- Media Violence.
MedLit and Safe Zones.
- Acosta-Anthes
- Dangerousness.
- Gardner-Salsbury
- Date Rape.
- Bailey-Garrisson
- Ban Curfews and pass Loitering Plus Laws.
Drug Legalization.
- Alspach-McQuade
- Prevention, Status Offenses.
- Keaton-Shaver
- Graduated Sanctions, Total Quality Management.
A source from Neosho says they'll be running GS at
nationals. TQM improves the JJS with databases and
coordinating all systems and programs.
- Chung-Johnson
- VORP.
Victim Offender Reconciliation Program. VORP is very
religious. It wasn't originally a gov program and it
was very Christian.
- Dalai-Morgan
- Ban Corporal Punishment, Parental Licensing.
Corporal Punishment defines it as abuse, so parents
won't spank their kids. They claim crime, abuse (Corp
Pun leads to abuse), and children's rights. If you press
them on the others, they will collapse to children's
rights. Its supposedly based on a Sweden model, and they
claim that it will also work in the US. Licensing is
based on the Westman Model, again advantages are crime,
abuse, and children's rights.
Hoberock-Thomas
- Samson-Serrano
- Parenting.
They do a combination of Hawaii Healthy Start and parental
licensing. They read Westman cards (the licensing author)
but the plan does home visits and parent training.
- Powell-Ward
- Abolish, Art, Title 9.
Title IX-- They enforce title 9, which encourages female
participation in sports and claim a health advantage and
a crime advantage.
Art Therapy-- They change goals 2000 to include teaching
art in every single class at school b/c art focus is key
to preventing crime as well as (pick your favorite
advantage). In other words, they change the other
advantage frequently.
- Stanescu-Wicks
- Ban the War on Drugs.
They run ban the war on drugs (not legalization) and
replace it with some programs that worked in Australia.
They are scared to admit that it is rehab programs so
press them here in cross ex and in the 1NC. They claim a
constitution advantage, but argue that the judge is a
congress person and is limited by the constitution.
- Hancock-Hess
- PTD.
They run it with recidivism constitutional rights
(claiming nuke war impact). I don't remember Kant
deontological imperative.
- Knapp-Urnstead
- Housing Reform.
Plan demolishes housing projects and has HUD build
individual houses, or Safety Secure Square Areas, to
replace them.
- Elwood-Morrissey
- Ban Rohypnol, Drug Legalization.
- Boe-Shaw
- Community Reintegrative Shaming.
- Fox-Lien
- Drug Legalization.
Clewis-Eatherton
Life Skills, Natives.
They are running life skills that solve for juvenile
drug abuse and gambling. They have a nuclear scenario
on case.
- Chirrelli-Walker
- Drug Legalization, ISP, and Runaways.
- Winer-Jessica
- Chess.
This is an interesting case - they fund chess programs
throughout the country with the intent that if everyone
plays chess no one will commit crime.
- Reid-Schroer
- Community Policing.
- Choppin-Cogney
- Head Start, Mentoring, and Perry Preschool (it's all one case)
- Jaime-Jeff
- Poverty.
- Keillor-Kraft
- Drug Treatment, Gender Bias, IPS.
Same as Eagan (which see), only they do three different models
which states can choose from: Phoenix House, Daytop House, and
something else I forget.
They have run a plethora of affirmatives. At the end of
the season they were focused upon two affirmatives. 1. Gender
Bias. This case attempted to solve the bias problem evident
within the juvenile justice system (unfortunately I never got to
judge this particular affirmative) 2. ISP/IPS: Intensive
Probationary Services. This has as its advantage decreased
recidivism, based upon the Boston model.
- Cameratta-Dorony
- Ban Dare, Civil Commitment, Head Start, Reverse Lopez.
- Habig-McQuaid
- Ban Dare, Civil Commitment, Head Start, Reverse Lopez.
- Paluf-Pavlovich
- Ban Dare, Civil Commitment, Head Start, Reverse Lopez.
I do not know which team runs which case, so consider
them all possibilities.
- Ellis-Smith
- Bullets, Lead.
They ran Ammunition Tracing (at the districts) which puts
a serial number on bullets and then when someone is shot,
they trace the bullet back to the company who made it and
sold the bullet and hold them liable for the death (I
think they issue a large fine). They have run Lead poisoning
for most of the year. Targeted abatement in the low income
sections of the city.
- Balser-Martin
- Ban Curfews.
They claim racism.
- Fisher-Tavery
- Bullets, Gun Education, Flores, Volunteerism.
- Dayani-Sokoloff
- Child Abuse, Runaways.
Case sets up shelters for kids that run away from home.
It legalizes running away, but not all status offenses.
- Dorn-Griffin
- Teen Domestic Violence.
All of their solvency is Suarez but they don't claim they
run the Suarez plan.
Kozel-Swanson
- Leistra-Yarnell
- Boot Camps.
New York modeled Boot Camps (Almost impossible to
beat). They like to run Militias on the neg.
- Ewing-Hensrude
- Ban Curfews.
Doesn't do Loitering Plus.
VAWA.
- Reilly-Ullmann
- MHD, PNC.
MHD Plan:
Juveniles are no longer allowed to be diverted to mental
health facilities from the court system at the federal
level. The insanity defense will be removed for federal
crimes. Federal mental health facilities will be closed.
Money to states in the are of mental health will be
banned. Federal money for mental health programs will be
banned. Federal money to research delinquency as a
biomedical occurrance will be banned.
Advantages:
1. Juvi Crime (via labeling, stigma, and inappropriate
treatment).
2. Rights (kids get beat up in the facilities-deontology).
3. Medicalization of Deviance/Social Control--Szazz
cards.
Juvi Crime T story:
1. When kids get put in mental facilities they get
labeled and stigmatized (hence Mike Males). They have
cards saying that mental institutions are manufacturing
young criminals.
2. Deterrence--they get rid of the insanity defense,
which deters people from committing crimes and thinking
they'll get out of it.
3. They change the focus of the crime «treatment» from
medicalizing policies that will fail to more traditional
means that will succeed.
The PNC case sets up women's health centers and does
regional co-ordination.
- Chuang-Noto
- Abolish JJS.
With a net advantage.
- Chacon-Morrison
- Ban Compulsory Ed, Drug Legalization, Smoking.
They will also run lots of T and J. They aren't real
deep on disad debates, and their kritik answers are
generally stuff like, «kritiks destroy debate."
- Borden-Tauber
- DeShaney, Natives.
DeShaney will still be in the box but the primary case
will be Tribal Courts. Straight-up version (Juvenile
Crime, Culture)
- Jones-Westmore
- Marshall Plan, Matrix waivers.
- Lee-Potter
- Guns, Hate Crimes.
The gun control case claims market disruption. Hate
Crimes educates teachers and police.
- Ahousa-Radakarishna
- Abolish, Ban Boot Camps, Ban Curfews, Graduated Sanctions, Waivers.
Abolish claims paternalism and due process. Case pivots on
one card on case that neg always drops. The card is
awesome and claims that the fact that the dichotomy
exists is reason enough to vote because the existence of
the JJS violates the constitution.
Boot camps has two versions. One keeps boot camps but
establishes a national human rights board to oversee
human rights violations. The second case is a straight
abolish case that claims racism or something.
- Guyerman-Wittreg
- Hawaii Healthy Start, Balanced
Approach, Coca-Cola's Valued Youth Program (for limited
English-proficient Mexicans), Children at Risk (Maybe)
Housing Projects (1969 advocacy). They always runs
Spending with perception links.
- Krause-Redlinger
- No Fault Divorce, Phonics.
- Brooks-Johnson
- Gun Tracing.
They run Gun Tracing most of the time, but have run
Natives and lead poisoning in the past.
- Bishop-Parker
- Date Abuse, PTD.
Date Abuse takes the Minnesota model and adds mandatory
arrests. They claim three scenarios: decreased crime,
violence, and rights. Keller is the PTD author. They
claim overcrowding and rights. (It's the UT version)
- Gragert-Sayeed
- In Re Gault, RICO, Tobacco.
In Re Gault bans all psychotropic drug use in
rehabilitation and allows juveniles to choose a punitive
model if they prefer that penalty to a rehab program.
They claim net widening, *big*. RICO expands the
Racketeering Influence Corrupt Organizations act to
include gangs. It claims domestic and international
terrorism. The tobacco plan passes an excise tax on
tobacco companies. It claims first and second hand smoke.
- Ard-Greenough
- School Uniforms.
- Gibson-Venkataraman
- Teen Courts.
Also run: Ban the insanity defense/psych testimony,
and end fed funding psych research on juveniles.
- Carrol-Kahn
- Hawaii Healthy Start.
They run a child abuse case based on Hawaii's Healthy
Start Program, with voluntary home visitations
Table of Contents
|
