Admin Args Case Lists Invites Judges Miscellany Results Theory TOC Topics
Back to the main page


hsdebate.com: Policy_Layne_Michael.html
From:           "Blennerhassett Debate" <blenndebate@hotmail.com>
To:             pgkst5@imap.pitt.edu
Subject:        Judging Paradigm (Michael Layne) 
Date:           Sat, 09 May 1998 18:39:49 PDT

Hey all!!!  My name is Michael Layne, and I will be judging policy at 
Grand nats in Detroit.  Responding to the request on cx-l, let me share 
with you my view of the activity...

1. I will adapt to you.  Do what you do best.  I mean it.

2. I try to be as tabula rosa as posibble (but I am human).  Again, I 
should adapt to you, especially at a tourney as eclectic as this one.  

3. Gaming is fine.

4. I will vote on T.  However, I do like to presuppose a reasonability 
standard.  I like to see some abuse, but I will vote on whatever interp 
is won.  Show me why reasonability sucks!

5. Speed is fine.  In fact, I like the critical thinking skills that 
speed develops, but I do want to HEAR the card quickly.  I don't like, 
"1. the aff intrenches the anthropogenic mindset.  Zimmmerman '95 
???????????????????????????????????????????."  If you are not clear, I 
will let you know.  "Clear!!!"

6. Kritiking...

a. I like it.  My team is going 8 min Heidegger.  What does that tell 
you?

b. I will vote on discourse... give me a good reason.  

c. I will allow the aff to argue that any specific kritik (I dislike the 
noun) should assume relevant burdens (uniqueness, competitiveness, 
whatever).  And I will allow the neg to say, "No way!  Kritiking is 
different!"

d. The metadebate is wide open here.  Whatever you say, I am going to 
listen... even if you want to "fiat" the paradigm.

7. Counterplans

a. cool... whatever

b. As far as fiat goes...  I view fiat as "propositional."  Thus, neg 
can "fait" anything that is germane to the question as the aff manifests 
it.  If it meets the competition test, the neg can fiat it.  Keep in 
mind, however, that I will listen to the aff answer too.

c. As far as the dispositional/conditional thing goes...  I will let the 
debate guide me.  Go for it... if you think you can out debate the other 
side on the theory.

8. Everything is debatable! I love the metadebate.

9. Have fun!

Where is all of this going to be avalible?  I want the list for my teams 
too.  I took the trouble to enter the info for you...  so, if you know, 
mail me at blenndebate@hotmail.com	  Thanks!		

Look forward to seeing you in Detroit,

Michael Layne   

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com