Admin Args Case Lists Invites Judges Miscellany Results Theory TOC Topics
Back to the main page

From:           MONICA STUBY <STUBYMON@ESUVM.EMPORIA.EDU>
To:             Phil Kerpen <pgkst5@imap.pitt.edu>
Subject:        Re: DEBATERS-- Judging Philosphies Please!

My judging philosophy is this:
  1)  Anything can be a voter if a debator gives reason for it to be a voter.
  2)  Stock issues still matter, although I'm usually a policy maker.
  3)  Tell a clear story in the second rebuttals....way the issues.
  4)  Don't be mean or stupid in cross-ex or in the entire round.

  Thanks for caring; wish we had something like this when I was in high school!
  Monica Stuby
  Emporia State University