Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:17:51 -0600
From: Bob Jordan <BobJordan@MAIL.SMSU.EDU>
To: EDEBATE@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Electronic Research Bibliography
[ Part 1, Text/PLAIN 96 lines. ]
[ Unable to print this part. ]
I ran across a few more citations from Debate Issues which are not yet in my main database.
Bob Jordan
***Electronic Research and Forensics***
Updated 10-28-98, Version 2
Adams, T. L. (1996). Lexis/Nexis, the Tarbaby. Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 200-205.
Adams, T. L. (1996). The unfair burden presented by database access deficiency: Concerning Lexis/Lexis and forensics research. The Forensic of Pi Kappa Delta, 81(4), 39-45.
Adams, T. L., & Wood, A. F. (1996). The emerging role of the World-Wide-Web in forensics: On computer mediated research and community development. The Forensic of Pi Kappa Delta, 81(4), 21-35.
Bart, J. (1994-95). Is there an exit from the information superhighway? The dangers of electronic research. Forensic Educator, 9(1), 28-31.
Bickford, D. (1990). Library and archival resources for forensics research. National Forensic Journal, 8(1), 51-55.
Collier, L. M. (1996). The Lexis/Nexis debate: A response to Elliott. Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 190-199.
Congalton, K. J., & Olson, C. D. (1995). Electronic research: The impact on arguments in individual events. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 143-145). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Crawford, C. B., & Krug, L. (1995). Electronic mail and the development of debate theory: A case study of the tabula rasa paradigm (CS-509-037). Hays, KS: Fort Hays State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 772)
Elliott, S. (1996). The impact of Lexis-Nexis on competitive debate. Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 183-189.
Gehrke, P. J. (1998). Evidence in the global village: The promise and challenge of computer-assisted research in intercollegiate debate. Speaker and Gavel, 35, 46-61.
Grassmick, D. (1996). Why LEXIS wrecks our pedagogy-and what to do about it. Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 211-215.
Harris, S. (1995). The changing face of community: The impact of electronic listservs on argument within the debate community. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 128-132). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Hartney, G. (1997). Debate research on the internet. Debate Issues, 31(1), 1-14.
Jarman, J., & McDonald, K. (1995). Arguing across spheres: The impact of electronic LISTSERVs on public sphere argument. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 133-138). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Katsulas, J. (1994-95). The utility of electronic research in debate: A positive view. Forensic Educator, 9(1), 24-27.
Madsen, A. (1996-97). Using electronic research in forensics. Forensic Educator, 11(2), 12-13.
Matthiesen, E., Sitzmann, M., & Taylor, D. (1977). "Instant research": The use of Medline in researching medical-related debate cases. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 14(2), 96-98.
Muir, S. A. (1993-94). Community perspectives on electronic research. Speaker and Gavel, 31(1-4), 111-130.
Newman, B. (1995). Electronic research: issues facing the community of academic debate. Debate Issues, 28(5), 2-4.
Newman, B. (1997). Electronic research: issues facing the community of academic debate. Debate Issues, 30(4), 3-5.
Rogers, J. E. (1996). A critique of the Lexis/Nexis debate: What's missing from this picture? Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 222-228.
Voight, P. A. (1996). The lost art of specialty research: Lexis-Nexis and the dumbing-down of intercollegiate debate. Southern Journal of Forensics, 1(3), 206-210.
Voth, B. (1997). Catching a wave in the internet surf: Electronic extemporaneous speaking. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(4), 200-205.
Wastyn, R., & Stables, G. (1995). The influence of electronic databases on contemporary debate practice: Considerations of argument selection, fiat, and evidentiary standards. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 139-142). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
|
